University Accepts, Then Returns Controversial Grant
Baylor University in Waco, Texas, accepted a $643,401 grant from the Eula Mae and John Baugh Foundation to promote LGBTQ+ inclusion in churches. The grant aimed to “foster inclusion and belonging in the church,” focusing on the disenfranchisement of LGBTQIA+ individuals and women within congregations. Hours after news coverage intensified, Baylor announced it would return the grant, citing concerns from its religious community. Supporters viewed the grant as a step toward compassion and justice, while detractors argued it contradicted Baylor’s Christian identity, highlighting deep divisions within faith-based higher education regarding LGBTQ+ acceptance.
Professor Greg Garrett Publicly Supports Inclusion Effort
English professor Greg Garrett, known for his outspoken views on gender and sexuality, publicly supported Baylor’s initial acceptance of the grant. Garrett, who holds the Carole Ann McDaniel Hanks Chair of Literature & Culture, tweeted his approval, linking the initiative to Christian teachings about love and inclusion. He framed conservative media criticism of his views as attacks on his faith and integrity. Garrett’s comments emphasized his belief that affirming LGBTQ+ individuals aligns with biblical teachings, sparking renewed debate on social media and within Christian circles.
Past Controversies Resurface
Garrett has faced scrutiny in the past for comments about LGBTQ+ issues, including statements made in his theology classes and on social media. In 2024, he criticized author J.K. Rowling for her views on transgender people and labeled James Baldwin as a key theologian, highlighting Baldwin’s impact on gay liberation. Critics, including prominent Christian commentators, accused Garrett of undermining biblical teachings. His classroom discussions and public posts often provoke polarized reactions, reflecting ongoing tensions between progressive and traditional Christian perspectives.
Conservative Response and Public Debate
Conservative pastors and commentators expressed alarm at both the grant and Garrett’s advocacy. Rev. Matt Kennedy compared Baylor to a deceptive shepherd, accusing Garrett of leading people astray. Garrett responded by emphasizing his faith and refusal to back down from his beliefs, despite media attacks. He maintained that his views do not represent Baylor’s official stance. Commentators from Woke Preacher Clips and Protestia amplified criticisms, framing Garrett as part of a broader cultural shift they oppose.
Baylor’s Institutional Balancing Act
Baylor’s affiliation with the Baptist General Convention of Texas adds complexity to its public stance on LGBTQ+ issues. While individual faculty like Garrett advocate for inclusion, the university ultimately chose to return the grant. This decision reflects an effort to balance progressive initiatives with its religious commitments, highlighting ongoing tensions within faith-based educational institutions. Supporters of the grant expressed disappointment, while detractors saw the move as a necessary defense of biblical values. Baylor’s actions underscore the broader debate facing religious universities navigating cultural and theological divides.
Source:
Baylor U prof. doubles down on LGBTQ+ inclusion grant, alleges ‘far-right media’ attack
Photo by Donald Guy Robinson on Unsplash
About Post Author
Some of these terms used in rhetoric today are misleading. “Incusion” or “inclusive” is one of these terms. Sure, church accepts everyone, but we don’t condone certain behaviors. Was the purpose of the grant to “affirm” (another such term), meaning to tell the new members their lifestyles were alright? Of course we know that they are not alright. If the grant were however to “foster inclusion” to make people feel at home with all of us who battle sin and want to overcome it, then I believe most Christians would accept such a grant.